↓
 
  • Phoronix
  • gromacs
  • OpenFOAM

Performance analysis, tools and experiments

An eclectic collection

  • Home
  • Blog
  • Tools
    • wspy – workload spy
  • Workloads
    • Geekbench
    • gromacs
      • lysozyme tutorial
      • PRACE benchmark
    • OpenFOAM
    • Phoronix
      • aobench
      • apache
      • asmfish
      • blake2
      • blender
      • botan
      • build-gcc
      • build-linux-kernel
      • build-llvm
      • build-php
      • bullet
      • c-ray
      • cachebench
      • compilebench
      • compress-p7zip
      • compress-pbzip2
      • compress-zstd
      • ebizzy
      • encode-flac
      • encode-mp3
      • ffmpeg
      • ffte
      • fftw
      • fhourstones
      • fio
      • fs-mark
      • gimp
      • git
      • go-benchmark
      • graphics-magick
      • hackbench
      • himeno
      • hmmer
      • indigobench
      • java-gradle-perf
      • java-scimark2
      • luajit
      • m-queens
      • mafft
      • n-queens
      • nginx
      • numpy
      • octave-benchmark
      • openssl
      • osbench
        • osbench – create processes
        • osbench – create threads
        • osbench – memory
      • parboil
      • pgbench
      • phpbench
      • polybench-c
      • povray
      • primesieve
      • pybench
      • radiance
      • rbenchmark
      • redis
      • rodinia
      • scikit-learn
      • scimark2
      • sqlite
      • stockfish
      • stream
      • stress-ng
      • tensorflow
      • tinymembench
      • tjbench
      • tscp
      • ttsiod-renderer
      • vpxenc
      • x264
      • y-cruncher
  • Experiments
Home→Author mev - Page 4 << 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 >>

Author Archives: mev

Post navigation

← Older posts
Newer posts →

Phoronix article – Ryzen 2600/2700 benchmarks (2018-05-16)

Performance analysis, tools and experiments Posted on 2018-05-17 by mev2018-06-14

Phoronix posted an an article measuring Ryzen 2600 and Ryzen 2700. The comparisons were a 9-way CPU comparison of new processors (7 AMD and 2 Intel). In this posting, I’ll look more at the workloads being tested.

Continue reading →
Posted in analysis | Tagged phoronix benchmark article | Leave a reply

Performance counters and memory analysis; checking with pmu_tools

Performance analysis, tools and experiments Posted on 2018-05-17 by mev2018-05-21

After my previous post on backend analysis, I got a chance to look further breaking out backend stall statistics.

Continue reading →
Posted in analysis | Tagged memory, metrics, performance counters, pmu_tools | Leave a reply

Phoronix article – clear linux benchmarks (2018-05-16)

Performance analysis, tools and experiments Posted on 2018-05-15 by mev2018-05-23

Phoronix posted an article about Clear linux. The goal was to look for changes in the system after all packages were rebuilt with GCC 8.1.

Continue reading →
Posted in analysis | Tagged phoronix benchmark article | Leave a reply

Phoronix article – compiler benchmarks (2018-05-10)

Performance analysis, tools and experiments Posted on 2018-05-10 by mev2018-05-22

Phoronix posted an article benchmarking GCC 8.1 today. These benchmarks compare GCC 8.1 vs GCC 7.3 on a variety of Ubuntu 18.04 systems. While I haven’t reproduced the exact comparisons on Ubuntu, in this article I make some notes about … Continue reading →

Posted in analysis | Tagged phoronix benchmark article | Leave a reply

Phoronix article – Clear Linux benchmarks (2018-05-04)

Performance analysis, tools and experiments Posted on 2018-05-04 by mev2018-05-20

Phoronix posted an article about Clear linux benchmarks. The article was a three-way comparison between Clear Linux, Ubuntu 18.04 LTS and Fedora 28 on a variety of workloads. While I don’t have the same systems to compare, this posting characterizes … Continue reading →

Posted in analysis | Tagged phoronix benchmark article | Leave a reply

Phoronix article – Ubuntu 18.04 vs 16.04 (2018-05-02)

Performance analysis, tools and experiments Posted on 2018-05-03 by mev2018-05-19

On May 2nd, Phoronix published a benchmark comparison of 18.04 vs. 16.04 on multiple systems. It was intended to compare “out of the box” experiences. As the article notes, similarities and differences between these systems include gcc 7.3 vs. gcc … Continue reading →

Posted in analysis | Tagged phoronix benchmark article | Leave a reply

TODO list at end of April

Performance analysis, tools and experiments Posted on 2018-04-30 by mev2018-04-30

As April finished, useful to take stock of where analysis is at as well as next steps. During May, I may also take a few week break to finish publishing my book and a cycle trip- so also useful to … Continue reading →

Posted in tools | Tagged progress report | Leave a reply

wspy – memory analysis for processes; need to sanity check the metrics…

Performance analysis, tools and experiments Posted on 2018-04-29 by mev2018-04-30

As a followup to this post, I’ve implemented per-process capture of backend counters. I can now create a memory report from a process tree.

Continue reading →
Posted in analysis, experiments, tools | Tagged memory, metrics, top-down | Leave a reply

wspy – added –perfcounter-model application

Performance analysis, tools and experiments Posted on 2018-04-29 by mev2018-04-29

I have added a new mode: –perfcounter-model application this supplements the previous two modes: –perfcounter-model process –perfcounter-model core This mode works similar to the process model, except only the root process is instrumented and then the “inherit” flag is passed. … Continue reading →

Posted in tools | Tagged performance counters, wspy | Leave a reply

Adding robustness to building process trees

Performance analysis, tools and experiments Posted on 2018-04-28 by mev2018-04-28

The ptrace(2) man page shows how one can subscribe for events such as PTRACE_EVENT_FORK or PTRACE_EVENT_VFORK type events that happens when a process calls fork()/vfork(). At such an event one can then call ptrace(PTRACE_GETEVENTMSG,…) to retrieve the pid of the … Continue reading →

Posted in tools | Tagged ftrace, process tree, ptrace | Leave a reply

Post navigation

← Older posts
Newer posts →

Archives

  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • March 2020
  • August 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018

Tags

/proc/stat analysis technique c-ray ftrace geekbench geekbench-description gromacs hyperthreading ipc kernelshark likwid likwid-perfctr likwid-topology memory metrics on_core on_cpu OpenFOAM parboil perf performance counters periodic sampling phoronix phoronix benchmark article phoronix cpu suite pmu_tools process tree progress report ptrace rusage Ryzen spectre system hang top-down trace-cmd uprof virtualization wspy

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
©2025 - Performance analysis, tools and experiments - Weaver Xtreme Theme
↑